In the modern world, information
about traumatic events, such as earthquakes, major accidents, and terrorist
strikes claiming innocent lives, spreads quickly. Further, media provides
repeated exposure to the major catastrophic events in the form of newsfeeds
that add new details about the events as they are uncovered. It is an
inherently important question whether media exposure can induce stress
responses in a similar manner and magnitude than being at the site of the
catastrophe. This is an important question from at least three perspectives: 1)
answering this question provides important information about human cognition
and emotional responses in the modern global information flow environment, 2)
mental health professionals can better appreciate media-exposure related
problems, and 3) also given that the population at large is often the intended
psychological target of terrorists who carry out acts of violence.
In their recent study, Holman et al. (2013) compared media vs. direct exposure to a collective
trauma, by carrying out a survey over the two weeks following the Boston
marathon bombings, in representative samples of persons living in Boston, New
York, and rest of the united states. When the authors adjusted acute stress
symptom scores for demographics, preceding mental health, and prior collective
stress exposure, it was observed that >6 hours of media exposure to the
marathon bombing events during the week following the bombings was associated
with higher acute stress symptoms than direct exposure to the bombings.
These very interesting findings suggest
that indirect exposure to traumatic events via
repeated media coverage may produce even stronger stress responses than direct
exposure to the event, which is a clear indication of the robustness of
prolonged and repeated media-exposure in triggering stress-related mental
health problems, even though, as pointed out by the authors, it has to be kept
in mind that emergency actions taken by the local authorities in cases of
direct exposure to the bombings likely lessened distress in that group. Mass
media may thus inadvertently serve as a channel that spreads the psychological
trauma far beyond the directly affected population. Outside of the scope of
considering the effects of mass-media coverage, these results further suggest
that being repeatedly related information about a catastrophic event can
trigger stress response and produce symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder
without direct exposure, which may also be an important form of
societal-cultural learning.
Reference: Holman EA, Garfin DR, Silver RC. Media’s role in
broadcasting acute stress following the Boston Marathon bombings. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA (2013) e-publication ahead of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316265110